Size doesn't matter? Armaments and reproductive success in bulb mites
Wiki site of the practical exercise of the VIII Southern-Summer School on Mathematical Biology.
Here you will find the exercise assignment and the group's products.
If you are a group member login to edit this page, create new pages from it, and upload files.
Evolutionary trade-offs are crucial to understanding dimorphism in a species. A common choice revolves around the distinction between natural and sexual selection: for a male, is it better to outcompete other males in the fight for resources or in their sexual prowess?
A clear example of this dilemma appears in the bulb mite Rhizoglyphus robini – an acarus often considered a pest in plantations around the world. Males of this species can be either brawny fighters or skinny scramblers. While fighters obviously come on top in the competition for resources, Van den Beuken et al. (2018) have found that scramblers can sire a higher number of offspring, balancing the scales and ensuring the morph's persistence.
Build a mathematical model that describes the showdown between scramblers and fighters in R.robini. Add whatever elements you deem essential to the population's dynamics.
This article here shows evidence of a third male morph: the mega-scrambler, a huge male that resembles a female. How would that morph change the scenarios you explored?