2018:groups:g8:start
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
2018:groups:g8:start [2018/01/11 08:21] – movendo outras ideias pro Gdocs mendes | 2018:groups:g8:start [2024/01/09 18:45] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
**Group 8** | **Group 8** | ||
- | ====== Competition between brown bear and grey wolf ====== | + | ====== Competition between brown bears and grey wolves |
Wiki site of the practical exercise of the [[http:// | Wiki site of the practical exercise of the [[http:// | ||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
===== Introduction ===== | ===== Introduction ===== | ||
- | Different apex predators may share the same resources in a given environment. For instance, the grey wolf and the brown bear are predators of ungulates in North America and Europe. Tallian et al. evaluated a long dataset to understand how the presence of bears affects the killing rate of wolves and found that the time between consecutive kills made by wolves increased in the presence of bears, in both sites. The authors suggest some mechanisms to explain this: | + | Different apex predators may share the same resources in a given environment. For instance, the grey wolf and the brown bear are predators of ungulates in North America and Europe. Bears usually dominate scavenged prey, which motivates the common assumption that wolves have to hunt more in the presence of bears to compensate the loss of resources. Tallian et al. evaluated a long dataset to understand how the presence of bears affects the killing rate of wolves and found , unexpectedly, |
* bears reduce densities of neonate ungulates (i.e. exploitative competition) | * bears reduce densities of neonate ungulates (i.e. exploitative competition) | ||
* wolves take longer between kills by attacking larger preys or by feeding on usurped kills under bears' presence (i.e. interference competition and/or kleptoparasitism) | * wolves take longer between kills by attacking larger preys or by feeding on usurped kills under bears' presence (i.e. interference competition and/or kleptoparasitism) | ||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
{{ : | {{ : | ||
© Stan Tekiela | © Stan Tekiela | ||
- | |||
- | |||
===== Assignment ===== | ===== Assignment ===== | ||
- | Think about the balance of exploitative | + | Propose |
- | + | ||
- | Propose | + | |
- | ===== Extension | + | ===== Questions and suggestions |
- | The authors suggest that the presence of both predators possibly impact prey less than the sum of their individual impacts. | + | * Be careful about the distinctions between kill rate, consumption rate and population growth rate. |
+ | * Consider the difference, in this system, between exploitative and interference competition. How can bears increase the feeding rate of wolves? Do bears affect the handling time of wolves? | ||
+ | * Are there only negative effects of bears on wolves’ kills, or are positive effects possible? In that case, what would be the consequence for the populations dynamics? | ||
+ | * The authors suggest that the presence of both predators possibly impact prey less than the sum of their individual impacts. | ||
===== Reference ===== | ===== Reference ===== |
2018/groups/g8/start.1515658917.txt.gz · Last modified: 2024/01/09 18:45 (external edit)