Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- 2017:groups:g7:start [2017/01/09 18:59] – pato
+++ 2017:groups:g7:start [2024/01/09 18:45] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 ** Group 7 **
-====== Pollination-Prey Conflicts in Carnivorous Plants ======
+====== Gobbling up your pollinator ======
+Wiki site of the practical exercise of the [[http://www.ictp-saifr.org/mathbio6|VI Southern-Summer School on Mathematical Biology]].
+Here you will find the exercise assignment and the group's products.
+If you are a group member login to edit this page, create new pages from it, and upload files.
 {{ :2017:groups:g7:rick_moranis_png.png?180| An example of conflict in carnivorous plants.}}
@@ Line 8: / Line 13: @@
 Insectivorous plants benefit from trapped, dead insects as a source of nutrients. On the other hand, most of these plants also depend on free-moving, live insects as pollen vectors for sexual reproduction.
-This pollinator-prey conflict can be resolved from temporal separation of flower and trap development through the life-history of individuals.
+This pollinator-prey conflict can be resolved by temporal separation of flower and trap development through the life-history of individuals.
-Spatial segregation of both systems can also resolve this conflict, as illustrated here by two //Drosera// species (//D. spatulata// and //D. arcturi//; Figure 1A-B).
+Spatial segregation of both systems can also resolve this conflict, as illustrated here by two //Drosera// species (//D. spatulata// and //D. arcturi//; Figures 1A-B).
 Other species (such as //D. auriculata//; Figure 1C) are able to produce distinct chemical signaling profiles for flowers and traps, thus relying on the ability of pollinators to differentiate between these chemical cues.
 Nonetheless, even in the presence of such traits, potential pollinators may end trapped by their mutualistic partners.
@@ Line 18: / Line 23: @@
 ===== Assignment =====
-Develop a mathematical model that represents the dynamics of population densities on pollinator-prey conflicts in carnivorous plants and explore its behavior.
+Develop a mathematical model that represents the dynamics of population densities on pollinator-prey conflicts in carnivorous plants and explore the implied consequences for these species.
 ===== Suggestions and Questions =====
@@ Line 26: / Line 31: @@
   * What is the indirect effect of pollinator density on prey density?
   * Can a carnivorous plant population survive only relying on pollinators for both reproductive and nutritional purposes?
+  * Investigate the effects of the mechanisms carnivorous plants may employ to resolve these conflicts. For instance, you may assume that during the phenological cycle of the plant there is a marked reproductive phase where flowers are produced and traps are supressed, thus inducing temporal segregation between flowers and traps.
-  * Investigate the effects of the mechanisms carnivorous plants may employ to resolve these conflicts. For temporal segregation, you may consider some phase lag between flower and trap development. For spatial or chemical segregation, you may consider that this segregation is mediated by some phenotypic trait in the carnivorous plant population (for instance, the distance between flowers and traps).
+===== References =====
-=== References ===
 El-Sayed, Ashraf M., John A. Byers, and David M. Suckling. “Pollinator-Prey Conflicts in Carnivorous Plants: When Flower and Trap Properties Mean Life or Death.” Scientific Reports 6 (February 18, 2016): 21065. doi:10.1038/srep21065.
+===== Results =====
+  * [[http://200.145.112.249/webcast/files/Group_7%20.pdf|Group presentation]]