2017:groups:g6:start
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
2017:groups:g6:start [2017/01/07 03:45] – [References] prado | 2017:groups:g6:start [2024/01/09 18:45] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
Plants evolved a huge and diverse weaponery against herbivory, like toxic chemicals and mechanical defenses. | Plants evolved a huge and diverse weaponery against herbivory, like toxic chemicals and mechanical defenses. | ||
- | |||
{{http:// | {{http:// | ||
Line 18: | Line 17: | ||
- | Although such defenses do hinder herbivory, top-down control by predators is also very important to keep the population of many herbivores in check. | + | Although such defenses do hinder herbivory, top-down control by predators is also very important to keep the population of many herbivores in check. |
- | [[https:// | + | [[https:// |
{{ : | {{ : | ||
Line 27: | Line 26: | ||
* Predation decreases in well-protect plants because herbivores can accumulate on their own tissues the toxic compounds of plants, making the preys less edible for predators. | * Predation decreases in well-protect plants because herbivores can accumulate on their own tissues the toxic compounds of plants, making the preys less edible for predators. | ||
* Predators are attracted by volatiles that the plant elicits when injured by herbivores. Herbivores make less injuries (e.g. less leaf chewing) in protected plants, making preys harder to be spotted by the predators. | * Predators are attracted by volatiles that the plant elicits when injured by herbivores. Herbivores make less injuries (e.g. less leaf chewing) in protected plants, making preys harder to be spotted by the predators. | ||
- | * Non-consumptive predator effects((non-consumptive effects are the "costs associated with defensive changes in prey traits in response to perceived risk" ([[https:// | + | * Non-consumptive predator effects((Non-consumptive effects are the "costs associated with defensive changes in prey traits in response to perceived risk" ([[https:// |
- | * Non-consumptive predator effects can also be attenuated because | + | * Non-consumptive predator effects can also be attenuated because |
Line 36: | Line 35: | ||
===== Suggested questions ===== | ===== Suggested questions ===== | ||
- | {{https:// | + | {{https:// |
Here are some questions you may explore, but further well-grounded insights are also welcome. | Here are some questions you may explore, but further well-grounded insights are also welcome. | ||
- | * Are the tri-trophic systems ((a system of populations coupled by trophic links that spans three trophic levels, as the plant-herbivore-predator | + | * Are the tri-trophic systems ((A system of populations coupled by trophic links that spans three trophic levels, as the plant-herbivore-predator |
* Under which conditions protected and unprotected plants can coexist? | * Under which conditions protected and unprotected plants can coexist? | ||
* What is a more effective way to control crop pests: to plant protected varieties or to increase predator densities? | * What is a more effective way to control crop pests: to plant protected varieties or to increase predator densities? | ||
- | |||
Line 52: | Line 50: | ||
* [[https:// | * [[https:// | ||
+ | ===== Results ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | * [[http:// |
2017/groups/g6/start.1483760736.txt.gz · Last modified: 2024/01/09 18:45 (external edit)