Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- 2019:groups:g10:start [2019/01/12 20:07] – [Introduction] mendes
+++ 2019:groups:g10:start [2024/01/09 18:45] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 **Group 10**
+<html><font size=6 face="Arial">Fear of the Crab </font></html>
-====== Fear of the Crab ======
 Wiki site of the practical exercise of the [[http://www.ictp-saifr.org/viii-southern-summer-school-on-mathematical-biology/|VIII Southern-Summer School on Mathematical Biology]].
@@ Line 23: / Line 22: @@
 <WRAP clear></WRAP>
-Experiments have been developed to assess the propagation of the nonconsumptive predator effects through food-chain and its interplay with intra-specific competition. Nevertheless, the complexity of the system indicates that a modelling approach might provide important insights on the dynamics. The joint effect of competition, predation and fear among snails and that of competition, predation and indirect effects among barnacles might result in different scenarios, depending on the intensities and mechanism of each process.
+Experiments have been developed to assess the propagation of the nonconsumptive predator effects through food-chain and its interplay with intra-specific competition. The joint effect of competition, predation and fear among snails and that of competition, predation and indirect effects among barnacles might result in different scenarios, depending on the intensities and mechanism of each process.
+Matassa et al. (2018) found that the competition among barnacles was dependent on the predation risk upon snails, suggesting a coupling between behaviours across trophic levels. The authors also assessed the competition among snails and verified that its intensity was dependent on NCE's from top predators, but not from prey availability. Additionally, it was found that in a high //Nucella lapillus// density context, the //S. balanoides// population was more depleted when no //Carcinus maenas// individual was present, but in a low //Nucella lapillus// context the resource depletion was equivalent in both contexts.
 ===== Assignment =====
+Build a mathematical model of the dynamics of this biological system. Analyze the model and use it to formulate and answer questions you may find along the way.
-Build a mathematical model that incorporates the dynamics of this biological system. Analyze the model and use it  to formulate and answer questions you may find along the way.
 ===== Suggested Questions =====
-  * What kind of dynamics can be predicted by a mathematical model of this interaction? Does the model reproduce results found in experiment? If so, does this occur for all set of biologically reasonable parameters?
+  * Does your model reproduce the non-consumptive effects on resource depletion found in experiments? Is this resource depletion dependent on the intermediate consumers population, as observed by Matassa et al. (2018) ?
+  * What kind of dynamics can be predicted by a mathematical model of this interaction? Does the model recovers observed behaviour for realistic values of the key parameters?
-  * By changing their behaviour, the snails favour a decrease in their mortality in face of an increased food intake. Does the model provide insights on this strategy ?
+  * By changing their behaviour, the snails favour a decrease in their mortality in face of an increased food intake. Does the model provide insights on this strategy?
   * Considering a scenario in which the experiment performed by Matassa et al. (2018) (see ref. below) allowed for consumptive predator effects from the //C. maenas// upon the //N. lapillus//, what qualitative changes on dynamics could be expected?
@@ Line 40: / Line 42: @@
   - Matassa, C.M., Ewanchuk, P.J., Trussell, G.C., 2018. Cascading effects of a top predator on intraspecific competition at intermediate and basal trophic levels. Functional Ecology 32, 2241–2252. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.13131
+  - Donelan, S.C., Grabowski, J.H., Trussell, G.C., 2017. Refuge quality impacts the strength of nonconsumptive effects on prey. Ecology 98, 403–411. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.1647
+  - Matassa, C.M., Donelan, S.C., Luttbeg, B., Trussell, G.C., 2016. Resource levels and prey state influence antipredator behavior and the strength of nonconsumptive predator effects. Oikos 125, 1478–1488. https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.03165