Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- 2016:groups:g2:start [2016/01/03 17:47] – [To be short or to be tall?] mendes
+++ 2016:groups:g2:start [2024/01/09 18:45] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1
@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 If you are a group member login to edit this page, create new pages from it, and upload files.
-==== Introduction ====
+===== Introduction =====
-The evolution of species traits is driven by different selective pressures, which can be determined by species interactions. If different interactions can lead to distinct selective pressures, the overall combination of each interaction's relative contribution can select species traits. //Primula farinosa// is a perennial herb with two different types of floral morphs, a short morph and a tall morph. Antagonistic interactions such as herbivores that consume flowers favor a short floral morph, whereas pollinators are more attracted by a tall floral morph. Ågren and colleagues (2013) found that geographical variation in the distribution of floral morphs from //P. farinosa// is correlated with the variation in the strength of interaction with herbivores and pollinators.
+The evolution of species traits is driven by different selective pressures which can be determined by species interactions. If different interactions can lead to distinct selective pressures, the overall combination of each interaction's relative contribution can select species traits. //Primula farinosa// is a perennial herb with two different types of floral morphs, a short morph and a tall morph. Antagonistic interactions such as herbivores consuming flowers favor a short floral morph, whereas pollinators are more attracted by a tall floral morph. Ågren and colleagues (2013) found that geographical variation in the distribution of floral morphs from //P. farinosa// is correlated with the variation in the strength of interaction with herbivores and pollinators.
-{{:2016:groups:g2:captura_de_tela_2015-11-30_a_s_11.53.50.png?nolink&200|Floral Morph}} //P. farinosa// floral morphs
+{{:2016:groups:g2:captura_de_tela_2015-11-30_a_s_11.53.50.png?nolink&350|Floral Morph}} //P. farinosa// floral morphs
 ===== Assignment =====
-Propose a simple but realist mathematical model that unravels the relative contribution of mutualistic vs antagonistic interaction for the adaptive differentiation of floral morph in this system. Use this model to explore the ecological or evolutionary consequences of the proposed dynamics.
+Propose a simple but realistic mathematical model that unravels the relative contribution of mutualistic //vs.// antagonistic interactions for the adaptive differentiation of floral morph in this system. Use this model to explore the ecological and/or evolutionary consequences of the proposed dynamics.
 ===== Proposed questions =====
@@ Line 25: / Line 25: @@
 ===== References =====
-  *Ågren et al. (2013) //Mutualists and antagonists drive among-population variation in selection and evolution of floral display in a perennial herb// Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences vol.110 no.45 pp. 18202-18207 [[http://www.pnas.org/content/110/45/18202.full|link]]
+  *Ågren //et al.// (2013) //Mutualists and antagonists drive among-population variation in selection and evolution of floral display in a perennial herb// Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences vol.110 no.45 pp. 18202-18207 [[http://www.pnas.org/content/110/45/18202.full|link]]
-  *Vanhoenacker et al. (2013) //Non-linear relationship between intensity of plant–animal
+  *Vanhoenacker //et al.// (2013) //Non-linear relationship between intensity of plant–animal
 interactions and selection strength// Ecology Letters vol. 16 pp. 198-205 [[http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ele.12029/full|link]]