Diferenças

Aqui você vê as diferenças entre duas revisões dessa página.

Link para esta página de comparações

apoio:intro [2020/02/12 13:13]
paulo [História e epistemologia da biologia e ecologia]
apoio:intro [2020/10/30 20:30] (atual)
paulo [Críticas ao funcionamento da ciência]
Linha 76: Linha 76:
  
   * [[http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/dec/09/how-journals-nature-science-cell-damage-science|How journals like Nature and Science are damaging science]]: uma crítica de Randy Schekman, pêmio Nobel de medicina.   * [[http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/dec/09/how-journals-nature-science-cell-damage-science|How journals like Nature and Science are damaging science]]: uma crítica de Randy Schekman, pêmio Nobel de medicina.
 +  * Neff, M.W., 2020. How academic science gave its soul to the publishing industry. [[https://issues.org/how-academic-science-gave-its-soul-to-the-publishing-industry/| Issues in science and technology, 36(2): 35-43]].
   * Smaldino, P.E. and McElreath, R., 2016. The natural selection of bad science. Royal Society Open Science, 3(9), p.160384.   * Smaldino, P.E. and McElreath, R., 2016. The natural selection of bad science. Royal Society Open Science, 3(9), p.160384.
   * Fischer, J., Ritchie, E.G. and Hanspach, J., 2012. Academia's obsession with quantity. Trends in ecology & evolution, 27(9): 473-474.   * Fischer, J., Ritchie, E.G. and Hanspach, J., 2012. Academia's obsession with quantity. Trends in ecology & evolution, 27(9): 473-474.
apoio/intro.txt · Última modificação: 2020/10/30 20:30 por paulo
CC Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported
www.chimeric.de Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki do yourself a favour and use a real browser - get firefox!! Recent changes RSS feed Valid XHTML 1.0